When I was reading this post, the words..."doesn't have a place in their static stories about the nature of life" seem to be very important. Most theories we get in schools about the nature of life and evolution of life are still based on old theories which had their importance of course, but only for the levels of nature where they are discovered or maybe for some part of life. There are people who are trying to urge leaders to take into account what recent theories (some of them almost 100 years old) are telling us. Even that seems to be very difficult because our economy is based on the old ones.

When we accept that the earth is a very intelligent being and treat her with the utmost respect she deserves, this is still a big step further but so much needed.

In my own twenties and thirties, I studied in my "alternative life", laws of nature. In fact, I never realized that nature itself changes, that structures evolve even though I knew and hoped that the time for awakening was there. In fact, I was hoping that something would change the world fundamentally, but didn't have a sense what this really meant.

I would like that everyone on the earth, and specially our responsable (political) leaders would take time to reflect on the consequences of not taking action and about what it would be if they decide to stand up for nature and the creation as a whole. I feel that following these written Source Communications and giving them a chance to be part of every life, would be a big step forward in the awakening process of us as human beings, that is very needed at this point in time.